ShareThis Page

Greensburg Tuesday takes

| Monday, Jan. 21, 2013, 8:53 p.m.

Sense & seniors' taxes: Unity supervisors are proceeding with a plan that could lower taxes for “seniors” (still undefined), starting with a property owners survey. The question unanswered is why should this beneficence be bestowed on so-called “fixed-income” residents when the financial wherewithal of many younger homeowners is no less fixed? And if this tax consideration shifts Unity's age demographic, who's going to pay the township's bills? Favoring one group over another is a quick trip to a predictable pitfall.

The Bovard decision: The Hempfield Area School board's 7-2 vote to close Bovard Elementary School, though hardly surprising, will either fade into the obscurity of prior board actions or come back to bite school directors if the “fit” projected for schools receiving Bovard students fails to work out. The population around Bovard is increasing, school proponents say. Time will tell whether this was a logical move based on reasonable conclusions or a costly mistake, especially if the elementary school has to be reopened at some future date.

Fine 'em: Since some folks can't drive around the diamond in Ligonier without tearing up the grass and/or damaging underground utilities, it's been suggested that the borough junk up this greenery with strategically placed boulders. Here's a better idea: Install a video camera and post a fine of $250 or more for cars and trucks that fail to negotiate the ample roadway around the diamond. But don't ruin one of the most beautiful spots in Westmoreland County.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.