| Opinion/The Review

Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

The Benghazi scandal: The difference it makes

Email Newsletters

Click here to sign up for one of our email newsletters.

Letters home ...

Traveling abroad for personal, educational or professional reasons?

Why not share your impressions — and those of residents of foreign countries about the United States — with Trib readers in 150 words?

The world's a big place. Bring it home with Letters Home.

Contact Colin McNickle (412-320-7836 or

Daily Photo Galleries

'American Coyotes' Series

Traveling by Jeep, boat and foot, Tribune-Review investigative reporter Carl Prine and photojournalist Justin Merriman covered nearly 2,000 miles over two months along the border with Mexico to report on coyotes — the human traffickers who bring illegal immigrants into the United States. Most are Americans working for money and/or drugs. This series reports how their operations have a major impact on life for residents and the environment along the border — and beyond.

Thursday, Jan. 24, 2013, 9:00 p.m.

The Obama administration's default position continues to be misrepresentation. Now add manufactured righteous indignation to the mix.

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton shed the tears, raised the hands and pounded the table when, during a Wednesday hearing before a Senate committee, she was cornered with the reality of the failures and cover-up in the scandalous tragedy now known simply as Benghazi.

As Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., pressed Mrs. Clinton, she exploded:

“With all due respect, the fact is we had four dead Americans. Was it because of a protest or is it because of guys out for a walk one night and they decide to go kill some Americans? What difference, at this point, does it make?”

But it makes all the difference (and not for the false choice she proffered).

The Obama administration lied — for weeks — about the true nature of Sept. 11, 2012's attack on the U.S. consulate in Libya, which left dead the U.S. ambassador and three others. And it's clear it did so — in the middle of an election campaign, on the 11th anniversary of 9/11 and in light of Osama bin Laden's killing — to preserve the campaign narrative that the administration had conquered terrorism.

The Benghazi murders were not the spontaneous result of the “protest” of an amateur video. The murderers were not “guys out for a walk.” It was, of course, a well-orchestrated terrorist attack, one that the Obama administration invited by ignoring pleas for better security.

Indeed, Mrs. Clinton accepted responsibility for the Benghazi deaths. But that's not the same as accepting responsibility for the truth.

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.



Show commenting policy

Most-Read Editorials

  1. Pittsburgh Laurels & Lances
  2. The Brady affair: Contract law
  3. Alle-Kiski Laurels & Lances
  4. Greensburg Laurels & Lances
  5. Intrepid salute
  6. Regional growth
  7. The wind ruse: A failed policy
  8. At the VA: The waiting dead
  9. Dear Cleveland: Our condolences
  10. Medicare @ 50: Sick, getting sicker