Laurel: To Sen. Bob Casey. Getting the federal government to do an expensive, potentially dangerous and long-term project like the nuclear dump cleanup in Park Township almost always requires the backing of a powerful elected official. The late Congressman John Murtha got the federal government to start remediating the NUMEC site. In the past year, Casey has picked up Murtha's mantle and made sure this project stays on course.
Laurel: To Allegheny County. It continues to tap the gold mine that is its public parks by contracting private companies to offer money-making recreational and dining activities. A zipline course and a bicycle cafe in North Park are the latest examples. Smart moves — they serve the public and help to defray the parks' cost. We wonder what's in the works for Harrison Hills, Deer Lakes and Boyce parks.
On the “Watch List”: Electronics dumpers. Effective Thursday, residents no longer can dispose of their old electronic devices — TVs, computers, etc. — with the household trash. They have to be recycled. Inevitably, some lunkheads will dump unwanted electronics in rural, illegal dumping spots. Here's hoping local agencies that have taken the lead in “e-waste” recycling will rise to meet the increased demand.
Congrats!: To Larry Crawford. After 20 years in office, the Armstrong County sheriff is calling it a career. During that time, Crawford has overseen improved security at the courthouse, made sure his office was active in the Armstrong Drug Task Force and started a handgun safety program for women. Look for a lots of people to run for the sheriff's office in the May primary.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.