Share This Page

Sunday pops

| Saturday, Feb. 2, 2013, 9:00 p.m.

The headline on a Weekly Standard posting said it all: “Richest U.S. senator, John Kerry, rails against ‘corrupting' money in politics in farewell address.” ...Surely someone, somewhere is making book on when Teresa Heinz, the wife of the new secretary of State, will open her mouth and cause an international incident. We give her six weeks. And if past is prologue, it won't be very eloquent. ... Playboy empire heiress and avowed leftist Christie Hefner says climate change is a contributing factor in Chicago's exploding gun-murder rate. More precisely, she says murder rates tend to be higher when it's warmer and “this climate change effect is driving that.” By that standard, Playboy centerfolds also are a contributing factor. ... Speaking of Chicago, it features some of the nation's most stringent gun-control laws. Yet its murder rate this year is on pace to exceed last year's rate of more than 500 killings by gun. “Gun control” aids whom again? ... As expected, Washington types are blaming the economy's fourth-quarter contraction on there not being enough government (never mind that government spending was up 10 percent over the previous quarter). But as Competitive Enterprise Institute analyst John Berlau notes, the gross domestic product is more likely to have declined because of the specter of ever more government regulations. It should be all the proof necessary that government “pump priming” — they've called it “stimulus” — does not work and only damages the economy further. Where have all the history teachers gone?

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.