Share This Page

Greensburg Tuesday takes

| Monday, Jan. 28, 2013, 8:59 p.m.

Attention Norwin task force: Norwin school directors approved a preliminary 2013-14 budget that increases taxes by 5.25 mills, which would cost the average residential taxpayer an additional $130. By state law, the Norwin school board is supposed to hold any increase to 1.5 mills. But the board will seek a state exemption, which, if past is prologue, typically is approved. We trust the district's new “efficient and effective” citizens task force will have its say before this pocket-diving becomes a done deal.

Unacceptable: The theft of “a few thousand dollars” from the Normalville Area Volunteer Fire Company — firefighters would not provide a specific amount — is repugnant. But it also raises the question of why the money, a fairly substantial amount accrued from fundraisers, was left in a department safe instead of a bank account. The noble tradition of volunteer firefighting does not preclude commonsense fiscal protocols.

Insidious addiction: Most unsettling in Westmoreland County's record number of overdose deaths in 2012 — 71 with 14 pending cases — are those instances in which people got “hooked” on prescribed painkillers and turned to heroin or other street drugs, according to officials. That's a wake-up call for doctors and patients when pain “relief” these days is just a pill away.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.