Consider it an opportunity overlooked.
It's surprising that Jose Pedro Simoes Ferreira's name didn't surface during John Kerry's confirmation hearings for secretary of State.
Mr. Ferreira, 78, is the older brother of Mr. Kerry's wife, Fox Chapel ketchup heiress Teresa Heinz. Ferreira also is a former Portuguese naval officer linked to leftist Portuguese politics and reportedly backed a 1974 coup against Portuguese Prime Minister Marcello Caetano.
According to Allegheny County voter registration records, Ferreira lives in a four-bedroom, 3½ bathroom $628,000 home on Squaw Run Road in Fox Chapel on property adjacent to the sprawling 87-acre Heinz estate. County property assessment records indicate Teresa Heinz has owned the property where her brother resides since 1993.
Ferreira has avoided the spotlight over the years. And Mrs. Heinz-Kerry seldom speaks publicly about him. One of the few references to him came in a November 1974 Pittsburgh Post-Gazette story in which she mentioned that her older brother once had been a Maoist (one who is a devotee of the kind of Marxism-Leninism developed in China by Mao Zedong).
It seems odd that no one on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee sought to grill John Kerry on the troubling fact that the prospective secretary of State's brother-in-law once bought into the guiding principles of Communist China.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- The Thursday wrap
- State of surveillanc: The DEA database
- U.N. Watch: Climate games
- Open records: Hold the phone?
- Benchmarking questions: Fueling perversion
- Pittsburgh Tuesday takes
- Saturday essay: The thumb itches
- Snow shovelers needed: A call for volunteers
- Shenango shakedown: Public money at risk
- Jesse White’s chutzpah