ShareThis Page

Alle-Kiski Laurels & Lances

| Thursday, Feb. 7, 2013, 8:55 p.m.

Lance: To Penneco. The Delmont company arrogantly decided it wouldn't wait for Upper Burrell to approve its request to drill wells in the township and did so for a month without permits. But if the company wants to show it's “not hostile” to the township — as Penneco's representative told us — then it should've waited for the permits to actually be issued, which they eventually were. If the Marcellus industry wonders why people remain wary of drilling/fracking, incidents like this are a good example.

Laurel: To Westmoreland County Sheriff Jon Held. With gun applications up dramatically in the county, along with residents' questions, Mr. Held conducted a public forum Wednesday to address residents' gun rights. Given the hyperbole from gun grabbers and their media acolytes, a calm, fact-based discussion about guns and citizens' Second Amendment rights is refreshing. And overdue.

Lance: To the Allegheny County Airport Authority. The authority board demotes CEO Brad Penrod for failing to adequately strategize. Then, it names Mr. Penrod to the newly created position of “chief strategy officer” Good grief.

An observation: Want to help out local businesses? Then head to the Strongland HomExpo this weekend at the Pittsburgh Mills mall. The companies at the HomExpo employ your friends and purchase a lot of their goods and services from other local businesses. Remember, buy local.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.