Share This Page

Pittsburgh Tuesday takes

| Monday, Feb. 11, 2013, 9:00 p.m.

Return of the Pirates: Long before the swallows return to Capistrano and the buzzards return to Hinckley, Ohio, there's another harbinger of spring. And it came on Monday. Major League Baseball pitchers and catchers reported for spring training. The Pittsburgh Pirates have returned to Bradenton, Fla., hoping 2013 brings an end to their 20-year losing streak. Perhaps Pirates fans will have more satisfaction celebrating the swallows and buzzards.

Money PIT?: Let's get this straight — Allegheny County Chief Executive Rich Fitzgerald says things just weren't “working” at the county Airport Authority when it came to drumming up new business for Pittsburgh International Airport (PIT in FAA vernacular). So, the solution is to add another layer of bureaucracy and increase costs? At least one airline analyst calls it a fool's errand. We call it bad business as usual.

Luke's baggage: Amid some hinky behavior by police Chief Nate Harper — setting up a side business with subordinates, then appearing to give them preferential treatment — Pittsburgh Mayor Luke Ravenstahl is calling for department reforms. Of course, this gives his primary election challengers plenty of ammunition, such as: “It took 6 12 years for hizzoner to come to that conclusion?” Mr. Ravenstahl finds himself between an election and a hard place — whether Chief Harper remains in the city's employ or not.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.