Greensburg Tuesday takes
A judge's lesson: The art of the plea deal took a decidedly different turn when Westmoreland Judge Al Bell, in no uncertain terms, rejected the bargain — one year's probation — for former corrections officer Melissa Ann Boggs of Latrobe, accused of institutional sexual assault at Westmoreland County Prison. This “abomination,” as Judge Bell called the agreement, is a reminder to prosecutors that within the leeway of so-called sentencing “guidelines,” the pursuit of justice must be more than a routine exercise in “Let's Make A Deal.”
Not exceptional: Outstanding student achievement deserves recognition. But Franklin Regional's contemplation of honoring what would be multiple valedictorians, each of whom would receive the class rank of “1,” dilutes a distinction that's rightfully reserved for one student. That honor builds incentive for student achievement — more so than bundling the brightest together under the banner “We're Number One!”
Heating alert: The death of a Monessen woman, 77, who authorities believe was using her gas oven to dry clothes, is a sad reminder of the dangers of using “alternative” heat sources, especially stoves, and creating a buildup of deadly carbon monoxide. There are more than sufficient warnings about this danger. The tragedy in too many cases is that people assume this won't happen to them.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.