State of the union: It is imperiled
What is it that Barack Obama doesn't get about America, its economy and its people? Considering his continuing fealty to a policy of if at first you don't succeed, fail, fail again and sheer deception — everything.
The same president who empaneled a “jobs council,” then paid it and the legions of the unemployed lip service, proposes new government jobs programs that will, as before, produce no sustainable employment, pervert market forces, promote increased government dependence and reward cronies in pursuit of a hubristic and fetid national industrial policy.
Additionally and almost incomprehensibly, the president, in a continuing era of runaway debt of his making, wants even more and higher taxes and debt to cover the failures of his last failed interventions.
Then there's Mr. Obama's continuing and intellectually dishonest campaign against firearms — never mind that the government has an embarrassing record of failing to enforce gun laws long on the books. Why have a factual discussion when purposeful misrepresentations — think of the phrases “assault weapons” and “gun show loophole” and the demonization of law-abiding citizens — work so effectively to inflame passions?
The state of the union is not strong.
It is imperiled.
Gobbledygook is not governance.
And citizenship requires more than being “sheeple.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Tuesday takes
- Pittsburgh Tuesday takes
- Alle-Kiski Tuesday takes
- Greensburg Tuesday takes
- The Kane case: Distractions mount
- Trumpeting ObamaCare: The Medicaid factor
- A charging conundrum: Electric car fallacies
- The F-35: Is it a lemon?
- Trail endorsements
- Greensburg Laurels & Lances
- Greater Pittsburgh’s ‘brain gain’