Greensburg Laurels & Lances
Lance: To another unsettling episode of “Jeannette Knows Best.” So much for the city's “balanced budget.” Jeannette begins 2013 about $500,000 in the hole. Whether Jeannette now files for municipal bankruptcy, which is not so easily arranged, or seeks protection under Act 47, which would put a state overseer in charge, this long-running drama has been needlessly extended by wishful thinking and poor leadership.
An observation: The Norwin school board is revising its proposed 2013-14 budget, which would remain within the state limit of a 1.5-mill tax increase instead of the previously proffered 5.25-mill pocket-diving. But at least one school board member still wants to apply for an exemption to the state's cap — just in case. By law, school boards have that contingency. By design, taxpayers have none.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.