Merging American Airlines & US Airways is a lousy deal
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Thursday, Feb. 14, 2013, 3:36 p.m.
American Airlines and US Airways have agreed to a mega-merger. And provided a bankruptcy court approves of the $11 billion deal, the combined carrier, under the American nameplate, will be on the runway to becoming the world's largest airline by passenger volume.
But this flight should be canceled. It's not a good deal — not even with the much-touted 25 percent “premium” holders of US Airways stock will receive. In fact, it's a lousy deal likely destined for failure, one that should be summarily rejected by regulators.
As Forbes.com columnist Peter Cohan put it, “the pro-merger chest-pounding can't hide the fact that combining two losing companies does not make a winner.” The merger of American — a perennial loser of market share and money ($12 billion over the last decade) and in Chapter 11 bankruptcy since late 2011 — and US Airways — which began life in Pittsburgh as Allegheny Airlines, then grew up to snooker and shaft the taxpayers and political leaders who fed it and fawned over it — will lead to less competition and higher, monopoly-fueled fares. Additionally, as travel writer Rob Lovitt sees it, “low-cost carriers are unlikely to fill any gaps that result in post-merger cutbacks.”
And just as US Airways shafted Pittsburgh a few years back when it decommissioned Pittsburgh International Airport (built to its specifications at a premium) as a hub, look for it to now also shaft its current hometown hub of Phoenix, which sits between Los Angeles and Dallas, two robust American hubs. Some think US Airways' international hub in Philadelphia also will be on the chopping block.
The kind of “synergies” being touted by backers of this deal — that larger automatically means more efficient — is a false rubric in industry in general and for airlines specifically, notes Stanford University business scholar Jeffrey Pfeffer. “Mergers just increase market concentration, raise prices and make customers worse off,” he wrote for Bloomberg Businessweek. “Or in the airline business, if you take one troubled airline and combine it with another, all you get is a larger catastrophe.”
This catastrophe-in-the-making can and should be stopped.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- ‘Un-American’? That’s Harry Reid, the Senate’s lowly smear artist
- The market speaks: Cadillac dealers reject another electric folly
- Market perversions: Chrysler retreats
- Common Core: Garbage in, garbage out
- The new SAT: Rigor gets a pass
- Sunday pops
- THE BOX
- Pipeline conflicts
- More reefer sanity
- The Thursday wrap
- Another EPA crock: Sulfur silliness