ShareThis Page

The Thursday wrap

| Wednesday, Feb. 20, 2013, 9:00 p.m.

When Tom Horton finally departs from the reconstituted American Airlines (the merged American and US Airways), he'll take with him a $20 million severance. The company says it's a “reasonable and appropriate” payment. It's the kind of deal that gives “mergers and acquisitions” a bad name. ... He's baaaack. Robert Jubelirer, the longtime former and powerful Republican state senator of Blair County, driven from office for being one of the architects of the infamous legislative pay raises of 2005, is running for a seat on Penn State's 32-member board of trustees. Talk about chutzpah. ... The debt ceiling of the state Redevelopment Assistance Capital Program, or RACP, likely will be lowered to $600 million. But that's not low enough. The program, which should be rebranded as the state Capital Redevelopment Assistance Program, or CRAP, is nothing more than a corporate wealthfare slush fund. The debt ceiling should be reduced to zero. ... Remember Melowese Richardson of Cincinnati? She's the Ohio poll worker who claims she voted for President Obama twice in November — by absentee ballot, then at the polling place. Now investigators say she might also have voted four other times, using other names. But remember, voter fraud is a figment of the right-wing imagination. ... Bud Light is the preferred beer among underage drinkers, ages 13 to 20, according to a new survey. We somehow doubt that fact will translate into a new Budweiser advertising campaign. At least we hope not.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.