Penn State's THON campaign redefines 'remarkable'
The Penn State University community has every reason to be proud of the record-breaking $12.37 million this year's THON raised to fight pediatric cancer.
The yearlong fundraising campaign culminated with an on-campus dance marathon last weekend. More than 700 students stayed on their feet for 46 hours straight, supported by thousands of volunteers and cheered on by families who benefit.
Increasing this year's total almost 17 percent from the previous year's $10.6 million is a remarkable achievement, period. But achieved as it was — despite fundraising trips nixed due to Hurricane Sandy's effects and despite the shadow cast by the Jerry Sandusky scandal — it's even more remarkable.
A student spokeswoman had no explanation for THON shattering its fundraising record. But that total couldn't have been reached without the overwhelming generosity of students undeterred by hindrances beyond their control and of all whose combined donations set the new record.
This year's $12.37 million brings THON's total raised since 1977 for the Four Diamonds Fund at Penn State Hershey Children's Hospital to more than $100 million. And it underlines the positive value of PSU's school spirit and the PSU community's concern for children in a dramatic fashion that's impossible to ignore.
Congratulations to all who made this year's THON such a success — and encouragement to all working already toward another record next year.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Pension reform should not be linked to a natural gas extraction tax
- Union ‘fairness’: The dues racket
- An NLRB ambush
- The Kane chronicles: Meaningless moves
- Greensburg Tuesday takes