What's in a name? With new school, plenty
Armstrong School Board Director Dr. Paul Lobby says the proposed name for the district's new high school — to be built in Manor Township — might not sit well with those in the area served by West Shamokin High School in the eastern county.
Naming the new school Armstrong Junior-Senior High School might make those in the West Shamokin area feel as if they're not part of the Armstrong district, he says.
Tempest in a teapot — or a serious matter?
Given that West Shamokin sits along the westernmost section of the historic Great Shamokin Path used by Native Americans, we thought it was a brilliant name. But in naming the newest school, obviously nobody wants to use the name of any town for fear that somebody would feel disenfranchised — especially in a district where such sensitivity run strong (if not to the extreme).
Armstrong Central might be a good name, but it is no doubt in disfavor because that was the name of an aborted attempt to merge Kittanning and Ford City high schools some years ago.
While we believe the proposed name works well — and clearly the county's name could use a little more exposure — perhaps a name can be found that refers to the Allegheny River. (Yes, we know Riverside has been taken for a school in Oakmont, downriver in Allegheny County.)
What's needed is some creativity, and we're confident there are loads of creative people in the district. This should be a fun project — not a matter for dispute.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Marina at McKees Point on the mend
- The Kane ruling: Get on with it
- The Thursday wrap
- ‘Canary in a coal mine’: The SSDI dilemma
- Voter ID: A case reaffirmed
- The visa flap: A prevailing stench
- A school choice victory: Follow the child
- The student-loan balloon
- Orphan sinkhole
- Work’s the thing
- The immigration mess: Obama’s subversion