At the Carnegie Free Library: Repairing a resource
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Friday, Feb. 22, 2013, 8:57 p.m.
For 110 years, the Carnegie Free Library in Connellsville has been situated on a small hillside along South Pittsburgh Street, opening its doors to those seeking knowledge and information.
Through the efforts of board members, volunteers and its director, Casey Sirochman, the library is sure to remain here for many years to come.
Recently the library received a $150,000 state grant. The matching grant will help library officials make some much-needed repairs, including a new roof, windows and lighting. The match for the 2012 Keystone grant, through the Department of Education, is already in hand.
Indeed, the library is the city's prized historic possession. Over the years, however, its structure has deteriorated.
But library officials remain vigilant.
In addition to the grant, volunteers are working with the director and the board to raise money for repairs and renovations. The public has pitched in, as well, giving donations that have made it possible for various improvements at the aging facility.
Currently the Friends of the Library organization is working to open a cafe in the facility. Proceeds will go to the library.
Libraries are there for everyone. And officials and volunteers at the Carnegie Free Library want to make sure that our educational jewel remains in Connellsville to serve the various needs of not only today's generation but future generations as well.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- ObamaCare ‘rates’ & reality
- A union’s distress
- ‘Un-American’? That’s Harry Reid, the Senate’s lowly smear artist
- Saturday essay: The gardeners’ etiquette
- Sunday pops
- Pittsburgh Tuesday takes