The Sisters Orie: Convicted!
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Thursday, Feb. 21, 2013, 3:45 p.m.
Pennsylvania continues, sadly and tragically, to live up to what surely soon will become its official moniker by default — State of Corruption. On Thursday, suspended state Supreme Court Justice Joan Orie Melvin became the umpteenth high-ranking state official to be convicted on public corruption charges.
We use the word “umpteenth” because we no longer can keep count of the crooks.
Mrs. Melvin was found guilty on six of seven counts, three of them felonies. Her sister, Janine Orie, the justice's former top aide, was convicted of six of six public corruption counts in the same trial in Allegheny County Common Pleas Court. Another sister, Jane, the once-powerful state senator, is in prison for her public corruption convictions of nearly a year ago.
Thus, the Sisters Orie join a long line of state government “leaders” convicted of politicking on the public dime or other criminal activities. In their hubris of prosecuting their deceptions, sense of entitlement and power preservation, they thought nothing of abusing their public positions, the public purse and the public trust.
Worse, they smeared their accusers as persecutors. It's behavior beyond the pale. And it's behavior that deserves the maximum prison time prescribed by law.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- ObamaCare ‘rates’ & reality
- A union’s distress
- The new SAT: Rigor gets a pass
- Pittsburgh Laurels & Lances
- Market perversions: Chrysler retreats
- Alle-Kiski Tuesday takes
- Greensburg Tuesday takes
- Pittsburgh Tuesday takes