ShareThis Page

Alle-Kiski Laurels & Lances

| Thursday, Feb. 28, 2013, 8:55 p.m.

Laurel: To Michelle Hawthorne. When some creep tried to strong-arm rob the Fueland convenience store in Freeport on Tuesday, Hawthorne, the clerk, fought back after he assaulted her. Within seconds, she shoved him out the door. Good for her.

Lance: To the Fueland robber. In addition to a probable prison term, this guy also faces a life sentence of humiliation. He'll never live down the fact that a petite woman whipped him and the video evidence of the incident is readily available. We're glad; serves the punk right.

On the “Watch List”: As much as we would detest the resulting UPMC monopoly, it appears more and more likely that the state Insurance Department will reject Highmark Inc.'s plan to essentially subsume the beleaguered West Penn Allegheny Health System. That's because, as Highmark now freely admits, it needs a new contract with UPMC, West Penn's chief rival, to make the West Penn deal work. The admi ssion could end up being the goose that further gilds the golden Romoff, so to speak.

Congrats and good luck!: The Burrell boys basketball team has knocked off several favored foes to reach tomorrow's WPIAL final. Now the Bucs face the mighty No. 1 seed, Beaver Falls. Do they have another upset in them?

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.