TribLIVE

| Opinion/The Review

 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

The chicken question: Give it a fair hearing

Email Newsletters

Click here to sign up for one of our email newsletters.

Letters home ...

Traveling abroad for personal, educational or professional reasons?

Why not share your impressions — and those of residents of foreign countries about the United States — with Trib readers in 150 words?

The world's a big place. Bring it home with Letters Home.

Contact Colin McNickle (412-320-7836 or cmcnickle@tribweb.com).

Daily Photo Galleries

Friday, March 1, 2013, 8:57 p.m.
 

Chickens or no chickens? That is the question.

A group of residents has asked Connellsville City Council to change its zoning ordinance to allow for urban chicken coops as an easy way to provide organic eggs for their families. Under the city's current zoning ordinance, backyard chicken farming is only permitted by special exception in highway commercial “C2” areas or industrial “M1” areas.

But the residents say urban chicken farming is growing in popularity — it's even in bigger cities such as Pittsburgh and New York.

If local zoning is changed to allow for urban chickens, pen sizes would be mandated and the number of chickens would be set.

City council and Mayor Charles Matthew voiced concern over the request, citing noise and health-related issues. The city's health board and health officer this week reinforced those concerns.

On the other hand, chickens provided for residents both sustenance and, conceivably, savings to boot. In upholding the public's interest, government has no mandate to simply say “No” without any due diligence.

Sure, there are concerns. In some city neighborhoods, homes are situated close together and backyards are small. Neighbors may not want to view a chicken pen when sitting outside enjoying a summer barbecue.

There's also the question of enforcement. Urban chicken farming investigations would be added to the city health/zoning officer's list of duties.

The residents' request deserves the city council's fair review, not a snap judgment.

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.

 

 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Editorials

  1. Pittsburgh Laurels & Lances
  2. Greensburg Laurels & Lances
  3. President Carbon: Hypocrisy’s trip
  4. Laurels & Lances
  5. The Pa. pensions debate: Union hypocrisy
  6. Alle-Kiski Laurels & Lances
  7. The ethanol mandate: More is less
  8. The gambling raids: The state’s racket
  9. Signing Michael Vick: Personal baggage & professional talent