Greensburg Laurels & Lances
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Thursday, Feb. 28, 2013, 8:55 p.m.
Lance: To gun-owner ignorance. It defies comprehension that anyone would leave a loaded gun in a purse within reach of a Luzerne Township 2-year-old. State police say the child found the weapon and shot himself in the face. The boy has been hospitalized. No charges have been filed in what police called a “tragic accident” — one that was entirely preventable. Responsible gun owners practice safety first and that means keeping firearms secured.
Laurel (with a caveat): To synchronizing traffic lights. Anyone who has ever traveled Route 22 in Westmoreland County knows the frustration of progressing from one red traffic light to the next. Now Murrysville Council, after meeting with PennDOT officials, has approved a contract for maintenance and modification of traffic lights, which one local official said have been malfunctioning for about a decade. Wasted fuel, wasted time. Here's hoping it won't take another decade to update traffic-light timing on other major thoroughfares in the county — most notably, along Route 30.
On the “Watch List”: The Derry Borough Council shake-up. Three councilors have submitted their resignations, reportedly because of changes in council leadership and committee assignments. There's been plenty of grousing and finger-pointing as of late. While council members don't have to like each other, they are expected to work in the public's interest. We trust incoming members will keep that in mind.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.