The Thursday wrap
Even The Associ ated Press now is forced to admit the painfully obvious: “It turns out wealthy families already are paying some of their biggest federal tax bills in decades even as the rest of the population continues to pay at historically low rates.” So there. ... Full-sized Ford and Chevrolet pickup trucks continue to pace this nation's auto sales. We can only wonder how long it is before the Obama administration attempts to ban them. ... We thought nobody could outdo Hanoi Jane Fonda for her treasonous Vietnam War performance. Then along came former NBA player Dennis Rodman's visit to North Korea and his sickening embrace of dictator Kim Jong-un. What's next, Jane and Dennis joining forces to go on an excellent adventure in Iran? ... One-time prospective Steelers buyer Stan Druckenmiller is garnering lots of attention with his warnings of dire financial consequences for today's youth because of the exploding costs of Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid. The one-time George Soros lieutenant, who's made his mark as an uber-successful hedge fund manager, says those programs' unfunded liabilities are as much as $211 trillion, far outstripping the current $16 trillion national debt. But remember, America doesn't have a spending problem; its problem is that “the rich” aren't taxed enough. ... Among the 17 people to receive presidential pardons last week was Larry Wayne Thornton of Forsythe, Ga. He was serving four years' probation for possession of an unregistered firearm and possession of a firearm with no serial number. We report, you deride.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.