Share This Page

Sunday pops

| Saturday, March 9, 2013, 9:00 p.m.

It's mind-boggling to think that The Toledo, Ohio, Block Bugler could manage to editorialize on the death of Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez without once mentioning that he was a member in good standing of the Royal Order of Egomaniacal Socialist Nuts Lodge No. 1. But it did. And it not only tacitly sided with this ding-dong for nationalizing (and ruining) the South American nation's oil industry, it rationalized Mr. Chavez's embrace of world dictators, in part, as “Latin American pride.” We can't wait to see The Bugler's editorial when Fidel Castro dies or when Bashar Assad takes a bullet to the head. ... The New York Post reports that 79.3 percent of New York City public high school graduates who enrolled last year in City University of New York's six community colleges had not mastered the basics of reading, writing and math and required remedial courses. These results, by the way, are brought to you by The Union Label. Everybody sing! ... Sayeth pundit Ben Stein: “Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured but not everyone must prove they are a citizen. And now, any of those who refuse or are unable to prove they are citizens will receive free insurance paid for by those who are forced to buy insurance because they are citizens.” Only in America in the 21st century. Sigh.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.