Share This Page

Greensburg Tuesday takes

| Monday, March 4, 2013, 9:00 p.m.

Air show grounded: The overhyped federal sequester will not generate much public sympathy if it goes unnoticed. So among all the histrionic hand-wringing came word last weekend that next month's Westmoreland County Air Show has been canceled because the Air Force has cut the remainder of the Thunderbirds flying team's schedule. In effect, the local extravaganza gets canned while the government's “show” at its putrid worst goes on. This turn of events is more pathetic than sad.

Serving justice: Jurors in the murder trial of Ricky Smyrnes met their considerable responsibility in an especially challenging case. For six weeks eight men and four women weighed testimony and stomach-turning evidence of how Mr. Smyrnes and his repulsive roommates demeaned, tortured and eventually killed Jennifer Daugherty in a Greensburg apartment. Sorting through it all, jurors delivered the most difficult (albeit justified) judgment that's asked of citizens impaneled for a jury: death. For residents summoned to jury duty, it doesn't get tougher than this.

Save the spineless!: Residents of a Hempfield neighborhood are going to have to wait longer for flood relief as the township and the state Department of Environmental Protection cannot agree on a proper fix. Among issues for the state is the preservation of spineless aquatic life. Never mind the health and well-being of residents, who have awaited a remedy to their flooded homes for years. Ah, government inaction — senseless and spineless.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.