TribLIVE

| Opinion/The Review

 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

New drone questions: Another slippery slope

Email Newsletters

Click here to sign up for one of our email newsletters.

Letters home ...

Traveling abroad for personal, educational or professional reasons?

Why not share your impressions — and those of residents of foreign countries about the United States — with Trib readers in 150 words?

The world's a big place. Bring it home with Letters Home.

Contact Colin McNickle (412-320-7836 or cmcnickle@tribweb.com).

Daily Photo Galleries

Friday, March 15, 2013, 8:57 p.m.
 

As if the Obama administration's explanations regarding the use of drones against Americans weren't troubling enough, now there's a new wrinkle — drones that can determine whether citizens are armed and can track cellphones.

Government documents, obtained by an electronic privacy organization under a Freedom of Information request, reveal that the Department of Homeland Security's Predator B drone fleet has been customized to identify people with guns and can pick up cellphone signals.

Attempting to squash another drone controversy, the Obama administration says only 10 of the drones are intended for use and then by U.S. Customs and Border Protection to identify armed illegal aliens at the border, The Washington Times reports. The agency insists it's not deploying the cellphone signal-interception capability.

We are not reassured, and for good reason.

Initially, Attorney General Eric Holder in correspondence to Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., said using lethal force against American noncombatants on U.S. soil via drones is “possible” under “extraordinary circumstances.” It took Mr. Paul's filibuster for Justice to acknowledge that doing so would be unconstitutional.

Americans don't need any more White House slippery-slope “interpretations” on the use of drones, whether to spot armed civilians or to spy where there's no warrant. For the last time we checked, the Fourth and Fifth amendments remain parts of the Bill of Rights.

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.

 

 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Editorials

  1. Greensburg Tuesday takes
  2. Alle-Kiski Tuesday takes
  3. Pittsburgh Tuesday takes
  4. The Kane case: Distractions mount
  5. Trumpeting ObamaCare: The Medicaid factor
  6. U.N. Watch: More propaganda
  7. Ford City facts: Blaming the messenger
  8. Signing Michael Vick: Personal baggage & professional talent