Election 2013: Closest to home
Who oversees the management of your school district? Who makes sure the streets of your borough or township are safe? And who decides how much tax you will pay based on the value of your home and land?
You will pick those people this year, first in the May 21 primary and then in the Nov. 5 general election.
You also have the obligation to decide who should be county coroner, district attorney, sheriff and jury commissioner.
Leading up to the primary and then the general voting, we have — or should have — a great deal to do.
We have to identify those candidates who will be able to rise above the petty and personal morass that so often hampers the creativity of our councils, boards of supervisors and school boards.
We need officials who are willing to advance the causes of their citizens — looking not only within municipal boundaries but also to cooperative ventures with neighboring towns — and who will work with elected officials on state and federal levels.
We need officials who will limit the tax revenue bite and find ways to involve citizens in improving life in our towns.
But mostly, we need leaders who know how to inspire citizens to work together for the good of the community, to look at the bigger picture and the longer term.
Our firefighters do it and our youth sports organizers do it. We should expect no less from those who aspire to public office.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- The Thursday wrap
- Beware of fireworks
- The overtime proposal: Regressive economics
- Collaring the EPA: Hold the cigars
- Brewster advances
- Social Security’s mess
- North Korea’s ‘example’: Shoddy ‘framework’
- The Box
- U.N. Watch: Sanction sidestep
- Apple Music & Taylor Swift: A good & timely lesson
- McKeesport Tuesday Takes