Greensburg Tuesday takes
Fix it: Officials say ongoing state computer outages, occurring since January, are stymieing concealed-weapon licensing at the Westmoreland County Courthouse. Citizens who take time out of their workday to exercise their Second Amendment right shouldn't have to “come back later” to get their licenses. No more excuses. Fix the problem — now.
Jeannette's future governance: As the cash-strapped city circles the bowl, so to speak, options under review include the adoption of home rule. But a state official, meeting recently with Jeannette's leaders, zeroed in on the wrong home-rule “benefit” — that is, it would allow the city to raise taxes beyond the limit set by the Third Class City Code. So, let's give more money to fiscal savants who've been unable for years to properly manage what they're getting now? The last thing Jeannette needs is additional incentive to drive more businesses and homeowners out of the city.
The ol' wink & nod: Gary Davis, the ex-chairman of the Jeannette Municipal Authority, received a nearly $6,500 lesson from the State Ethics Commission for participating in the hiring of his wife for an authority job — and one for which she allegedly had no experience. Such brazen favoritism attributed to the authority's former chairman, no less, raises a disturbing question: How many government job hirings at the local level fly under the state ethics radar and get winked-winked along? We can only imagine.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.