Our churches: A community resource
The debate pops up every so often: How vocal can churches become on political matters and still remain tax-exempt, nonprofit organizations?
Each year as we approach Easter, we applaud the good works on our local churches. Today we do the same — and urge them to take a step further.
Of course, we are not suggesting political action, but action for the good of the communities they serve.
Our churches already do many positive things — provide sites and workers for food banks, counsel troubled parishioners, work in second-hand stores, to name a few services. That work should continue.
But our churches also have the buildings strategically placed in their communities to provide the forums for local projects that make our lives better, and they have the people and the energy to make those things happen.
For instance, if we feel that violence or drug abuse is becoming a problem, could not a church group or a cooperative of churches discuss ways to address the problems? We think so.
If domestic violence is of concern, could not our churches assist in getting victims the help they need? Their members might be better positioned than government officials to identify problems.
Parishioners go to their churches for their own personal development but also for a common good. They are a community of friends and families, the best that hometowns have to offer. As such, they are also qualified in identifying where more concerted effort is necessary.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- For U.S. Senate, W.Va.: Elect Shelley Moore Capito
- Monsour’s legacy: A bitter pill
- For U.S. House in Ohio & West Virginia: Bill Johnson and David McKinley
- The Box
- McCaffery’s suspension: Castille’s concurrence
- Sunday pops
- The Paycheck Fairness Act: It’s not needed
- U.N. Watch: Gun-grabbers unite!
- For the Pennsylvania House: Ortitay, Krieger and Logan
- The drug database: Government overreach
- Early voting: Hardly healthy