Share This Page

Pittsburgh Tuesday takes

| Monday, March 25, 2013, 9:00 p.m.

The streak: The Pittsburgh Penguins go for their 13th-straight win tonight when they host the Montreal Canadiens. The Pens picked up their 12th in a row Sunday with a 2-1 overtime win against the Philadelphia Flyers. It's the Pens, by the way, that hold the NHL's longest overall winning streak at 17 games, set in the 1992-93 season. Hey!

The bottom line: Seems as if there are new revelations weekly that belie the VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System's defense of its actions in the deadly Legionella and Legionnaires' disease outbreak. As the Trib keeps documenting, the local VA simply didn't have a handle on the problem. And we wonder if it does now. Heads should roll.

Extend the T?: There are preliminary talks to extend the Port Authority's light-rail system to the North Hills — an 18-mile line with a cost (sure to explode) of $1.4 billion. But the targeted population really isn't dense enough to support the project. And there are other, far better and more economical alternative projects. Think Oakland.

High costs: Amid all this talk of expanding light-rail service comes this sobering reminder from the Allegheny Institute for Public Policy: The cost structure of the Port Authority of Allegheny County remains out of whack — among the highest in the nation of comparably sized transit agencies. So let's add more out-of-whack costs?

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.