Share This Page

The Thursday wrap

| Wednesday, March 27, 2013, 9:00 p.m.

Suspended Pennsylvania Supreme Court Justice Joan Orie Melvin, convicted on public corruption charges and to be sentenced on May 7, says she'll resign her seat on May 1. But honor dictated that she resign upon her February conviction. ... We're not sure what's worse — that the answer to a fifth-grade quiz question in Texas about why the United States was targeted by terrorists on Sept. 11, 2001, was “Decisions we made in the United States have had negative effects on people elsewhere” or that only one parent objected. ... The Bureau of Labor Statistics says there are more “green” jobs in the American coal and petroleum manufacturing sector than there are in the solar and wind power generation sector. And among its other “green” jobs — bus drivers, trash collectors, radio broadcasters and movie producers. By that standard, making green jelly beans is a “green” job. ... And the winner of the 2013 Baghdad Bob Sound-alike Award is ... North Korean Nut-in-Chief Kim Jong-un for constantly putting his forces on alert to attack anything and anyone for any reason. His latest threat is to attack U.S. bases in Guam, Hawaii and the U.S. mainland. Of course, he signs his own death warrant should he be so delusional as to attempt to turn such rhetoric into reality. ... CNN's Ashleigh Banfield on Tuesday inexplicably linked the fact that the United States shared the world's highest rate of criminal executions in 2011 with the likes of Iran and Saudi Arabia to “state-sponsored terrorism.” Wow, talk about critical thinking skills, eh?

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.