Heritage Elementary School in Madison, Ala., banished the word “Easter” from this year's annual Easter egg hunt. “We're just trying to make sure we respect and honor everybody's differences.” While trampling on Christians. The ban also applied to the Easter bunny. After all, said Principal Lydia Davenport, “people relate the Easter bunny to religion.” Santa Claus can't be far behind. ... A review of United Nations travel expenses for 2010-11 shows the dictator-loving, human rights-ignoring world body slightly overspent its $72.5 million budget — by half-a-billion dollars. That's right, the U.N. spent $575 million on travel for that period. Reason No. 5,612,947 for Congress to defund the profligacy and send out invitations for the new League of Democracies. ... Surely New York will have to change its nickname from the Empire State to the State of Total Economics Ignorance. Obviously conceding that a higher government-mandated minimum wage would hurt businesses, it decided to stick the increase to taxpayers to the tune of between $20 million and $40 million. Goobernatorial (yes, the spelling is intended) spokesman Rich Azzopardi says the measure is designed to balance the needs of families with business owners looking to grow in a fragile economy. Ah, spoken like a true interventionist announcing the latest intervention to cover up the lie that was the last intervention (to end all interventions, of course).
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.