| Opinion/The Review

Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Freddie Mac deja vu?

Email Newsletters

Click here to sign up for one of our email newsletters.

Letters home ...

Traveling abroad for personal, educational or professional reasons?

Why not share your impressions — and those of residents of foreign countries about the United States — with Trib readers in 150 words?

The world's a big place. Bring it home with Letters Home.

Contact Colin McNickle (412-320-7836 or

Daily Photo Galleries

Tuesday, April 2, 2013, 9:00 p.m.

Among Freddie Mac's four largest mortgage “servicers” that handled about 20,000 complaints over a 14-month period, not one reported a single case of fraud or regulatory violation, according to a new audit.

Yep, everything's hunky-dory, based on the supposed due diligence by mortgage servicers Bank of America Corp., CitiMortgage, Provident and Wells Fargo & Co. Not that any of this is unusual.

Based on the audit by the Federal Housing Finance Agency's inspector general, 98 percent of Freddie Mac's mortgage servicers that collect payments and deal with borrowers reported no so-called “escalated” cases. We're talking about a mortgage giant, propped up by taxpayers, that guarantees more than 10.6 million residential mortgages worth an estimated $1.6 trillion.

“Mortgage servicers, Freddie Mac and the FHFA have not adequately fulfilled their respective responsibilities,” according to the audit reported by the Los Angeles Times.

In effect, these so-called mortgage managers, supposedly Freddie Mac's ground troops in dealing with borrowers, aren't complying with basic reporting requirements, according to the IG. And given this level of “oversight,” we return to a frighteningly familiar question: Are today's mortgages worth the paper on which they're written?

Such lackadaisical regard is more reason to break up mortgage monstrosity Freddie Mac and its equally ugly sister, Fannie Mae.

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.



Show commenting policy

Most-Read Editorials

  1. Pittsburgh Tuesday takes
  2. Tuesday takes
  3. Tracking cellphones: Warrants, first
  4. Greensburg Tuesday takes
  5. How to counter Putin in Syria
  6. The Thursday wrap
  7. The Pennsylvania budget: Wolf’s costly ploy
  8. WQED’s shake-up: Not enough
  9. Pittsburgh Laurels & Lances
  10. Saturday essay: Perpetual peppers
  11. Sunday pops