Share This Page

Greensburg Laurels & Lances

| Thursday, March 28, 2013, 8:55 p.m.

Lance: To taking out the garbage. A state association of waste haulers is suing Unity to block an ordinance that requires garbage haulers in the township to register with Unity and — heaven forbid! — list their rates. This supposedly “impinges” on haulers' rights to “freely” operate their businesses, they say. And in this ideal world of trash hauling, customers' ignorance is bliss? That's akin to arguing that supermarkets shouldn't list product prices.

Laurel: To protecting Ligonier's diamond. Rather than placing boulders, “bollards” or heaven knows what else on the greenery or changing the shape of the diamond to keep vehicles from jumping the curb along the roundabout, borough officials have opted for video surveillance. That and encouraging citizens to report motorists who drive over the grass should curb damages and preserve this Westmoreland County treasure.

On the “Watch List”: The Fayette County Airport Authority. Since former airport manager Mary Lou Fast was “furloughed,” the authority's finances have been largely a matter of guesswork. The agency reportedly is behind in some of its bills, and board members say they have no idea how much money the authority has on hand. But all are certain beyond doubt that there's been no misappropriation of money or other fiscal funny business. And how exactly do they know this? What's needed is an audit — posthaste.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.