| Opinion/The Review

Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Pittsburgh schools' 'progress': Sloppy practices

Email Newsletters

Click here to sign up for one of our email newsletters.

Letters home ...

Traveling abroad for personal, educational or professional reasons?

Why not share your impressions — and those of residents of foreign countries about the United States — with Trib readers in 150 words?

The world's a big place. Bring it home with Letters Home.

Contact Colin McNickle (412-320-7836 or

Daily Photo Galleries

'American Coyotes' Series

Traveling by Jeep, boat and foot, Tribune-Review investigative reporter Carl Prine and photojournalist Justin Merriman covered nearly 2,000 miles over two months along the border with Mexico to report on coyotes — the human traffickers who bring illegal immigrants into the United States. Most are Americans working for money and/or drugs. This series reports how their operations have a major impact on life for residents and the environment along the border — and beyond.

Monday, April 1, 2013, 9:00 p.m.

Real progress in financially strapped Pittsburgh Public Schools remains elusive — and harder to gauge than it should be, because of sloppy district practices.

Watchdog group A+ Schools' “2012 Report to the Community” says Pittsburgh Public Schools' 2011-12 average attendance was 94.4 percent in elementary schools and declined as grade levels rose, amounting to just 85.6 percent in high schools. And the high schools' average 2011 graduation rate was a disturbingly low 68.5 percent, suggesting far too many dropouts.

Carey A. Harris, A+ executive director, says the district's generally headed in the right direction, even though she can't say outcomes have changed for the better. But she does say district practices have — and cites actually tracking attendance as an example.

Also, according to Ms. Harris, some city schools not that long ago were neither taking attendance nor tracking students to identify those whose individual grades and attendance put them at risk for not graduating.

Harris says those shortcomings have been rectified. But with attendance and graduation data from prior years reflecting those sloppy practices, whatever baseline is used to measure progress inevitably is muddled.

And that means claims of real Pittsburgh Public Schools progress — whether made by the district, by groups such as A+, or by candidates in this spring's school board races — should be taken with extra grains of salt by city voters.

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.



Show commenting policy

Most-Read Editorials

  1. So, where’s the I-70 ‘Welcome to Pennsylvania’ sign on the Pa.-W.Va. border?
  2. The Fiat Chrysler mess: Government’s virus
  3. Yes, the IRS targeted conservatives
  4. At the VA: The waiting dead
  5. The Export-Import Bank: The Senate’s shame
  6. The wind ruse: A failed policy
  7. Pittsburgh Laurels & Lances
  8. Saturday essay: Dog days bark
  9. Sunday pops
  10. The Box
  11. Connellsville police seek help in crime crackdown