The Thursday wrap
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Wednesday, April 3, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
Gather 'round, boys and girls, and learn from the spender in chief how to budget. That's right. President Obama has designated April as “National Financial Capability Month,” during which his administration, among other goals, wants to teach young people “how to budget responsibly.” Seriously. “My administration continues to encourage responsibility at all levels of our financial system,” says Mr. Obama — who has added $6 trillion to the nation's debt since he took office. Total debt per U.S. household is estimated at $53,000 (not including unfunded entitlement liabilities, of course). How much more liberal “responsibility” can Americans tolerate? ... Among lawsuits generated by ObamaCare, there's this curious item filed by the Pacific Legal Foundation: The Affordable Care Act doesn't pass constitutional muster because the bill originated in the Senate, not the House, where bills raising revenues must begin. That much was made clear last summer when Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. defined ObamaCare as a federal tax, not a mandate, The Washington Times writes. Indeed, the courts have much unfinished business with this abomination. ... And speaking of abominations, the late Hugo Chavez looms larger than life in the Venezuelan campaign of his ex-bus driver protege, acting President Nicolas Maduro, who calls Mr. Chavez “the prophet of Christ on this Earth” who left his people “the greatest inheritance of all: a free and independent nation on the path toward socialism.” Mr. Maduro is leading challenger Henrique Capriles by 14 percentage points. More's the pity for Venezuelans in this socialist stronghold that has trouble enough just keeping the lights on.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Lever A-1: Pot-infused brownies
- Junk nutrition
- The secret ballot: Protect it
- Sunday pops
- THE BOX
- Keystone caper: Pipeline politics
- The big sting: To what end?