TribLIVE

| Opinion/The Review


 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

U.N. Arms Trade Treaty: Dead on arrival

Letters home ...

Traveling abroad for personal, educational or professional reasons?

Why not share your impressions — and those of residents of foreign countries about the United States — with Trib readers in 150 words?

The world's a big place. Bring it home with Letters Home.

Contact Colin McNickle (412-320-7836 or cmcnickle@tribweb.com).

Daily Photo Galleries

Wednesday, April 3, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
 

Contemptible as it is convoluted, the Arms Trade Treaty that sailed through the United Nations on Tuesday — and with considerable U.S. support — deserves swift rejection by the U.S. Senate as a fitting rebuke to the Obama administration for foisting this nonsense on the American people.

Hailed by naive supporters and gun-grabbers alike, the treaty is supposed to stem the flow of conventional weapons to terrorists and other thugs. How? By guilting the world's bad actors who supply the weapons into abiding by the treaty's stipulations. The treaty itself has no enforcement mechanism, The New York Times reports.

Why would the U.S. be a party to this “historic” U.N. “accomplishment” when, in fact, America already employs some of the toughest policies on the export of arms? As Heritage Foundation security policy expert Ted Bromund points out, “Negotiating treaties that the other side won't respect is a fool's errand. Unfortunately, we're continuing to play the fool.”

You see, the U.S. didn't simply support the treaty. Team Obama was “hugely constructive” in shoving the pact through Turtle Bay, according to a U.N. official. This, after the Obama re-election machine last year beat a hasty retreat from the treaty's negotiations.

Americans' Second Amendment right to bear arms has been tortured enough by “gun-control” lawmakers and their half-cocked assumptions. Now the Senate is supposed to ratify a treaty that would defer to the unaccountable arrogance of the United Nations? Absolutely not!

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.

 

 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Editorials

  1. A school choice victory: Follow the child
  2. The student-loan balloon
  3. U.N. Watch: The Gaza follies
  4. The visa flap: A prevailing stench
  5. Kittanning Council conundrum: Why disband authority?
  6. Mon-Yough Laurels & Lances
  7. The Connellsville WCVI building: Another fine mess
  8. Open contract negotiations: Let the sunshine in
  9. Saturday essay: Anatomy of a backache
  10. Sunday pops