More than a few defense-policy experts have drawn a straight line from President Obama's strength-through-weakness “nuclear zero” policy to North Korean nut in chief Kim Jong-Un's gum-flapping and nuclear saber-rattling. But not everyone is being so hard on the president. Why, we understand that Iran's Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is entirely supportive of the president's nuke policies, which have effectively taken the heat off his nuclear ambitions. ... A key statistic that Mr. Obama has been using to advance gun control is a tad out of date. He says up to 40 percent of all gun purchases are made without background checks. That figure comes from a relatively small sampling in a poll that's almost two decades old, Fox News reports. The Washington Post “Fact Checker” suggests that the president's numbers need some background checking of their own. ... Whereas the White House has canceled all public tours (at least for March) because of sequestration — and reportedly has chastised some reporters for not playing up the public's supposed pain — the bands will play on. Yes, the first couple's series of White House concerts will go on as scheduled this month, with Al Green, Queen Latifah and Justin Timberlake among others. Far be it for a mandatory (albeit minor) reduction in the growth rate of Washington spending to inconvenience the Obamas. ... Michelle Obama recently told invited White House guests at a workshop for the film “42” that “This is your house, too,” The Weekly Standard reports. And those shut-out school tours? The first lady tells them to eat their vegetables.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Another carbon credit scheme
- Recasting the EPA: Devolving power to the states
- Rick Perry’s indictment: The real abuse
- School funding canard: Money isn’t the answer
- The Gulftainer deal: Ports of peril?
- Rejecting Common Core: Flawed school standards
- Sunday pops
- Tuesday essay: Sophie
- Public records: Updates needed
- More foreign aid is no answer to border problem
- Another LCB fumble: The status-quo stupor