Pittsburgh Tuesday takes
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Monday, April 8, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
The “dogfight”: Jack Wagner, the former state auditor general and onetime Pittsburgh City Council president, holds a 7-percentage-point lead over Councilman Bill Peduto for the Democrats' mayoral nomination. And though the Trib poll shows Mr. Wagner's lead outside the polling margin of error for what's essentially the de facto general election, it also shows 20 percent of the electorate undecided in advance of the May 21 primary. Pollster Jim Lee sees a “dogfight.” And that's a healthy thing. At least for Democrats, that is.
Uh-oh: Here's a statistic not likely to make it into VisitPittsburgh's promotional materials — Pittsburgh is among the top 10 worst for personal budgeting. That's according to the inaugural Best & Worst Budgeters Study by Card Hub, a credit card comparison website. Among the best budgeters are those living in Boston and New York City. Joining Pittsburgh as among the worst budgeters are those in Kansas City and Las Vegas.
Sigh: The Pittsburgh Pirates are trying to avoid their 21st-straight losing season. But they're not exactly inspiring confidence. Going into Monday night's late game in Arizona against the Diamondbacks, the Bucs were off to their worst start since 2006. The Pirates begin a 10-game homestand on Friday. First up are the Cincinnati Reds. Here's to there being no place like home.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Junk nutrition
- The secret ballot: Protect it
- Lever A-1: Pot-infused brownies
- Alle-Kiski Laurels & Lances
- Liquor privatization: Now’s the time
- The big sting: To what end?
- Sunday pops
- THE BOX
- Keystone caper: Pipeline politics
- Voter fraud: Multiple-voting Melowese Richardson gets a federal pass
- Reject Common Core