Margaret Thatcher, 1925-2013: The Iron Lady (in her own words)
The death Monday at age 87 of former British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher has spawned countless words of praise. But none of them can match her own words, which are the most fitting tribute to the “Iron Lady”:
• “Being powerful is like being a lady. If you have to tell people you are, you aren't.”
• “The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.”
• “Of course it's the same old story. Truth usually is the same old story.”
• “I always cheer up immensely if an attack is particularly wounding because I think, well, if they attack one personally, it means they have not a single political argument left.”
• “Europe was created by history. America was created by philosophy.”
• “When I'm out of politics I'm going to run a business. It'll be called Rent-a-Spine.”
• “Consensus: ‘The process of abandoning all beliefs, principles, values and policies in search of something in which no one believes, but to which no one objects; the process of avoiding the very issues that have to be solved, merely because you cannot get agreement on the way ahead.' What great cause would have been fought and won under the banner, ‘I stand for consensus'?”
• “I think we've been through a period where too many people have been given to understand that if they have a problem, it's the government's job to cope with it. ‘I have a problem; I'll get a grant.' ‘I'm homeless; the government must house me.' They're casting their problem on society. ... It's our duty to look after ourselves and then also to look after our neighbor. People have got the entitlements too much in mind, without the obligations. There's no such thing as entitlement, unless someone has first met an obligation.”
Lady Thatcher more than met her obligations. And for that she's entitled to the world's appreciation and thanks. May she rest in peace.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Pittsburgh Tuesday takes
- An independent Scotland? Think again
- Greensburg Tuesday takes
- Drilling laws: Your rights
- Alle-Kiski Tuesday takes
- U.N. Watch: The aid ingrates
- Obama’s speech: Talk vs. walk
- Common Core: Rotten politics
- Pittsburgh Laurels & Lances
- Ban felon-lobbyists? A better idea