ShareThis Page

Greensburg Tuesday takes

| Monday, April 8, 2013, 9:00 p.m.

The circle of redistribution: It's tough to miss the irony of a $35,000 tourism grant, funded by a tax on Westmoreland County hotel rooms, that will advertise Laurel Highlands attractions to passengers aboard Spirit Airlines' flights into Arnold Palmer Regional Airport. If the ads entice airline passengers to visit the region, then they, too, will pay the hotel room tax (3 percent), a portion of which pays for the grants, which go to the redistributionists, who pick the winners, who receive an arbitrary share of the tourism grant money. Read on.

Grant fairness?: Reviewing the list of various tourism grant recipients, it's difficult to fathom the logic of a five-member committee that decided which of the 59 businesses (out of 103 applications) got greased and for how much. For example, two similar Ligonier-area restaurants each picked up grants — one received $2,500 while the other picked up $5,000. Based on the criteria for the grants, did the latter accrue twice the tourism revenue for the Laurel Highlands?

Is your dog licensed?: Throughout April, dog wardens in Westmoreland County will be on the lookout for unlicensed, unvaccinated dogs, which can cost owners fines of up to $300 per dog. Why risk it? For owners and their pooches, licensing (should a dog get loose) and vaccinations make sense. What's required is nothing more than being a responsible pet owner.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.