| Opinion/The Review

Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

The background check deal: Weak threat

Email Newsletters

Click here to sign up for one of our email newsletters.

Letters home ...

Traveling abroad for personal, educational or professional reasons?

Why not share your impressions — and those of residents of foreign countries about the United States — with Trib readers in 150 words?

The world's a big place. Bring it home with Letters Home.

Contact Colin McNickle (412-320-7836 or

Daily Photo Galleries

'American Coyotes' Series

Traveling by Jeep, boat and foot, Tribune-Review investigative reporter Carl Prine and photojournalist Justin Merriman covered nearly 2,000 miles over two months along the border with Mexico to report on coyotes — the human traffickers who bring illegal immigrants into the United States. Most are Americans working for money and/or drugs. This series reports how their operations have a major impact on life for residents and the environment along the border — and beyond.

Wednesday, April 10, 2013, 9:00 p.m.

It's not the apostasy that some conservatives are making it out to be. Neither is it the sea change that some liberals claim it to be.

So what actually is the deal announced Wednesday by Sens. Pat Toomey, R-Pa., and Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., two ardent gun-rights supporters, for expanded background checks on gun purchases? Not much for those liberals but more than conservatives might be ready to concede.

The deal, if approved, would require criminal background checks for all gun show and Internet sales. Private sales outside those arenas (including among family members) would continue to be background-check free.

But the reality is that the newly covered sales are a quite small proportion of total sales, most of which already are background checked. To wit, only about 4 percent of all gun sales come at gun shows — and most of those are through federally licensed dealers, who already must run background checks. And fewer than a quarter of such sales — 0.7 percent by one government count — involved any illegality.

More importantly, the Toomey-Manchin deal effectively kills “universal background checks” and proscribes any national gun registry, each quite fraught with privacy peril.

While the plan likely will do nothing to stem the kind of mass shootings out of which it was born — that it somehow would long has been a rubric of gun-grabbers — it's not a threat to the Second Amendment.

In fact, when additional provisions are considered — such as liberalized transport and interstate handgun sales rules and allowing those with concealed-carry permits (who've already undergone a rigorous review) to bypass background checks — the Toomey-Manchin proposal stands to streamline, not hinder, Americans' practice of their Second Amendment rights.

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.



Show commenting policy

Most-Read Editorials

  1. Pittsburgh Laurels & Lances
  2. Greensburg Laurels & Lances
  3. Alle-Kiski Laurels & Lances
  4. The Brady affair: Contract law
  5. Regional growth
  6. So, where’s the I-70 ‘Welcome to Pennsylvania’ sign on the Pa.-W.Va. border?
  7. The Thursday wrap
  8. Medicare @ 50: Sick, getting sicker
  9. Mon-Yough Laurels & Lances
  10. The wind ruse: A failed policy
  11. Sunday pops