The Boston bombings: Terror at the marathon
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Monday, April 15, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
The video could have been from Tel Aviv or Baghdad. Or Kabul or Karachi.
But it wasn't.
It was from Boston. On Patriots' Day, a holiday set aside to commemorate the first battles of the Revolutionary War. From one of the cities in which al-Qaida launched its deadly attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. Along a packed Boylston Street and midway through the finish of the fabled Boston Marathon.
At 2:50 p.m. on Monday, a powerful bomb went off in the crowd near the finish line. Seconds later, 100 yards or so back, there was another powerful blast.
It was a scene of carnage and death. Scores were injured. Officials say it was a well-planned and coordinated event.
Was it the work of foreign terrorists? Domestic terrorists? A “lone wolf”? And was it happenstance that the bombings came 20 years to the week of the end of the deadly Waco siege and 18 years to the week of the horrific Oklahoma City bombing?
We don't know. What we do know, however, and no matter the origin, is that the very fabric of America was attacked on Monday afternoon. It was a dastardly and cowardly act.
And we would remind, as did Jonathan Swift, that “It is unwise to punish cowards with ignominy; ... death is their proper punishment, because they fear it most.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Sunday pops
- THE BOX
- The big sting: To what end?
- Liquor privatization: Now’s the time
- Keystone caper: Pipeline politics
- Saturday essay: Resurrection
- Easter 2014: Churches’ vital role
- Another IPCC warning: More sci-fi
- Greensburg Laurels & Lances