Candidates forum: Connellsville issues & answers
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Friday, April 19, 2013, 8:57 p.m.
With the municipal primary set for May 21, it's not too early to think about your choices for Connellsville mayor and city council.
On Monday, the Daily Courier will sponsor a candidates forum for those whose names appear on the ballot for Connellsville mayor and city council. All three Democrat mayoral candidates (incumbent Charles Matthews, Greg Lincoln and Josh DeWitt), along with the Republican (Aaron Zolbrod) and Democrat (Tom Karpiak) seeking seats on city council, have agreed to participate.
The candidates will address issues facing the Connellsville community. The questions for the candidates have been suggest by our readers.
It's important for voters to be well-informed before they visit the voting booth. They should know where the candidates stand on the issues.
And candidates should gain our votes based on their ability to serve — not on who's friends with whom.
We encourage residents to attend Monday's forum, which is scheduled from 6 to 7:30 p.m. at the auditorium of the Carnegie Free Library on South Pittsburgh Street.
The answers the candidates give could help you choose the leaders of the city for the next four years.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Lever A-1: Pot-infused brownies
- Junk nutrition
- The secret ballot: Protect it
- Sunday pops
- THE BOX
- Keystone caper: Pipeline politics
- The big sting: To what end?