Share This Page

Pittsburgh Tuesday takes

| Monday, April 22, 2013, 9:00 p.m.

More wealthfare?: Unspecified “loans, grants or other assistance” is being dangled before a Slovenian LED lighting manufacturer to make Pittsburgh its headquarters and build a street light factory. Grah Lighting perhaps is best known for making LED auto bulbs for luxury vehicles. But other than making it easier for Grah to navigate the usual regulatory maze so it can more easily risk its own capital in pursuit of private profit, taxpayers have no business underwriting this effort.

Debt dive: Pittsburgh's per capita debt has taken a healthy nose dive in the last decade. The Allegheny Institute for Public Policy says last year's debt figure was $1,901. In 2001, it was $2,651. And that's “no small feat,” the think tank reminds, given the city's long struggle to corral its debt. If Pittsburgh can fix its unfunded pensions liability problem, too, real renaissance might be surprisingly close.

Prudent move: “Runner-only” zones have been added to this year's Pittsburgh Marathon on May 5. That's in light of the bombings at the Boston Marathon. It's a prudent way to prevent spectators who might have evil on their minds from mingling too close to runners. Other beefed-up security measures are not being made public and for obvious reasons. About 26,000 runners are expected. Up to 100,000 spectators will line the race route. Here's to a successful, safe and record-setting marathon.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.