TribLIVE

| Opinion/The Review

 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

IMMIGRATION REFORM: Here comes the bill

Email Newsletters

Click here to sign up for one of our email newsletters.

Letters home ...

Traveling abroad for personal, educational or professional reasons?

Why not share your impressions — and those of residents of foreign countries about the United States — with Trib readers in 150 words?

The world's a big place. Bring it home with Letters Home.

Contact Colin McNickle (412-320-7836 or cmcnickle@tribweb.com).

Daily Photo Galleries

Sunday, April 28, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
 

The one, definitive fact of the Senate's massive immigration bill, should it see the light of day, will be its enormous cost. The ditch diggers of deficit spending already have seen to that.

By specifying the bill's spending as “emergency requirements,” the 844-page measure skirts spending caps designated under the Budget Control Act of 2011, according to Romina Boccia of The Heritage Foundation. To be exempt, the so-called “emergency” must be unforeseen, temporary and require immediate action; the immigration bill meets none of those criteria.

As yet, the Congressional Budget Office hasn't tallied the bill's full tab. But a Senate aide puts the estimated cost at $17 billion over a decade, The Wall Street Journal reports.

Among some of the bill's more questionable allocations:

• Grants “as necessary” for people in border regions to have satellite telephone service because they don't have cellular service.

• Funds “as necessary” to upgrade the Justice Department's communications network.

• A $50 million subsidy for nonprofits to assist “eligible” immigration applicants to understand and abide by the new law.

Any senator with two cents of smarts can simply oppose the bill's “emergency” designation, which would then require a vote by 60 senators to waive this point of order.

And when will that happen? When illegal aliens start climbing U.S. border fences to get back into Mexico.

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.

 

 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Editorials

  1. Wilmerding’s gamble
  2. Thou shalt not parse the First: The Connellsville Ten Commandments decision
  3. The DHS crackdown
  4. Pittsburgh Tuesday takes
  5. Greensburg Tuesday takes
  6. The Kane case: Distractions mount
  7. Tuesday takes
  8. Greensburg Laurels & Lances
  9. The Thursday wrap
  10. Laurels & Lances
  11. Trumpeting ObamaCare: The Medicaid factor