ShareThis Page

Pittsburgh Laurels & Lances

| Thursday, May 2, 2013, 8:55 p.m.

Laurel: To Jack Wagner. The Democrat Pittsburgh mayoral candidate says the long-running feud between departing Mayor Luke Ravenstahl and fellow Democrat mayoral wannabe Bill Peduto, one that has spilled into the primary race, is a product of the “dysfunctional, childish environment in city government.” Both should “grow up,” he says. Sounds like the basis for a good campaign ad to us.

Lance: To CMU. Its College of Fine Arts allowed a woman to march in its spring carnival parade naked from the waist down. Her pubic hair was shaved in the shape of a cross. Her top attire was described as “a papal parody.” Many, naturally, took offense. We're all for free expression. But by any standard, this was tasteless.

Laurel: To coordination. The return of the refurbished Point State Park fountain will coincide with the opening of the 54th Three Rivers Arts Festival. The fountain and the 10-day festival will bow on June 7. Here's to a fountain that keeps working (for a change) and a festival in which rain, rain goes away and comes back some other days.

Best wishes: To the 26,000 runners expected for Sunday's Pittsburgh Marathon. And it's not just a road race. Yes, it's certainly the region's premier sporting event. But it's also the city's premier community event, what with tens of thousands of spectators holding street parties along the route. This is one classy event, all around. Runners, set!

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.