Volunteers' fine examples: Leaders take note
As in all counties in Pennsylvania, Armstrong is a series of small boroughs and townships and of school districts that cross those municipal lines.
Against this background, there are several things we do exceptionally well. Some examples:
• Relay for Life volunteers are some of the best fundraisers in the nation, creating an enthusiasm to raise contributions for cancer-related programs that is unequalled for its size. It crosses municipal boundaries.
• Volunteer youth sports programs provide enormous opportunity for local kids, involving hundreds of adults from all communities.
• Despite difficult economic times, volunteers have created and maintained an excellent network of trails on former railroad right-of-ways. And the local area has raised the funds and created a very impressive new YMCA facility. Both are regional enhancements.
• The ARC Manor drug and alcohol counseling and treatment center continues to enhance its services in the area and is constructing a new building in the West Hills.
Now, if we could just get our elected leaders to work together with the same enthusiasm and creativity.
Our area is not unique in limited intergovernmental cooperation. But given the examples set by their constituencies, we believe a little networking would not go amiss — perhaps officials visiting one another's meetings to explore synergies to address problems as expenses rise on overburdened taxpayers.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- The Thursday wrap
- The Corbett administration gives itself a headache with selective transparency
- Pittsburgh Tuesday takes
- The flood of illegals: Misplaced blame
- The Box
- The Moody’s downgrade: Inaction’s price
- Saturday essay: Ants with tool belts
- Alle-Kiski Tuesday takes
- An ObamaCare ‘re-do’?