Trashing the franchise: Colorado blows it
Democrats ramming their so-called “Voter Access and Modernized Elections Act” through Colorado's Legislature, which they control, seek to destroy time-tested electoral principles and procedures — and are inviting massive voter fraud and intimidation — for political gain.
The Washington Free Beacon reports the bill would:
• Eliminate local polling places and require voting be done by mail. Never mind secret ballots' necessity for free and fair elections — or increased ease of voter intimidation, which a Colorado watchdog group says has already happened in a local-level, mail-in recall election.
• Allow people to register on the same day they vote. Never mind rampant same-day registration fraud in Minnesota and Wisconsin — or a Milwaukee police report that blamed this practice for felons voting illegally, others voting twice and more votes than voters being recorded in a 2004 election.
Never mind, too, that Coloradans rejected both mail-in ballots and same-day registration in a 2002 referendum — by 20 percentage points. Or that, as Republican Secretary of State Scott Gessler points out, the bill allows his office just 3 1⁄2 months to implement technology it doesn't have.
Democrat Gov. John Hickenlooper ran as a moderate and has been mentioned as a potential presidential candidate. If he signs this bill, he'll endorse his party's cynical, self-serving trashing of election fundamentals — and encourage widespread voter fraud and intimidation.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.