Share This Page

The Thursday wrap

| Wednesday, May 8, 2013, 9:00 p.m.

Former Democrat New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson says Republican U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas should not be defined as a Hispanic — his father was Cuban — because, well, gee, he opposes the immigration reform measure wending its way through the Washington meat grinder. Since when do political positions define one's ethnicity? Since liberals — long ago — also began demeaning black conservatives as not being black at all. ... The editor of the Aurora (Colo.) Sentinel writes that “the real terrorist threat here in America” is the National Rifle Association. In fact, Dave Perry says America should “send the guilty monsters to Guantanamo Bay for all eternity and let them rot in their own mental squalor” because the NRA, in defending the Second Amendment, actually is undermining the Constitution. Ah, more “progressive” critical thinking skills on display. ... Sayeth Sen. Chris Murphy, D-Conn., “The idea that the Second Amendment was put in (the Bill of Rights) in order to allow citizens to fight their government is insane.” It's official, Chris Murphy just called Thomas Jefferson, James Madison and all of the rest of the Framers and Founders “insane.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.