Happy Mother's Day: For all she does
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Friday, May 10, 2013, 8:57 p.m.
Editor's Note: A reader shared this editorial that appeared in the Daily Courier in May 1988.
The person of whom we are thinking worked for probably less than 50 cents a day. Some days she made nothing. It's not that she didn't put in many hours and accomplished much; it's just how it worked out.
This lady was a laundress, a seamstress, a cook, a waitress and, in her spare time, a gardener. She cared for the children, the animals, the adults — whatever and whomever needed caring.
She was particularly good at caring for children. She seemed to have a knack at insight no one else around the job site had.
Although she had no rank, no seniority, no position, she was in charge of the entire operation. She shouldered each responsibility, making sure each day's work was done, with little or no help from anyone.
Despite all this responsibility, all this frustration, she rarely complained. She met each day as it came and did every task required of her.
She had no problem with this. It was her life.
You see, she was a mother.
Happy Mother's Day.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Pittsburgh Tuesday takes
- ‘Un-American’? That’s Harry Reid, the Senate’s lowly smear artist
- Greensburg Tuesday takes
- The market speaks: Cadillac dealers reject another electric folly
- The Malaysian jetliner probe: Passport insecurity
- Alle-Kiski Tuesday takes
- The new SAT: Rigor gets a pass
- The IRS scandal: Compelling Lerner
- Market perversions: Chrysler retreats