Alle-Kiski Laurels & Lances
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Thursday, May 16, 2013, 8:55 p.m.
Lance: To Chuck Pascal. The Leechburg attorney and longtime political operative is running for three — three — offices in next week's primary election: mayor, borough council and school board. State law prevents Pascal from serving in more than one. Our recommendation: Go to the polls on Tuesday and do not vote for this political mountebank for any office.
Laurel: To citizen involvement. Thanks to help from the public, New Kensington police captured a bank robbery suspect seven minutes after the First Niagara in Parnassus was held up last week. He escaped on foot and changed clothes in a yard, and people were calling the cops all along the way.
Good advice: Last week, a New Kensington family thankfully escaped with their lives in a fire at their rented house. But they lost all of their belongings. Making matters worse, they had no insurance. This should be a warning signal to all who rent – get renter's insurance. It's cheap and made even more affordable when bundled with auto coverage. Most homeowners, in particular those with mortgages, carry insurance. There's no reason for renters not to have coverage on their belongings.
Good luck: To Jim Budzilek. The Leechburg Area superintendent of schools overcame most of the problems that face tiny districts and strove to provide his students with the best education possible. We believe he'll do great as Mars Area's next superintendent.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Sunday pops
- The new SAT: Rigor gets a pass
- THE BOX
- ‘Un-American’? That’s Harry Reid, the Senate’s lowly smear artist